Adapt technical copy for a different audience

Changing audience should change explanations, not facts. Preserve constraints while replacing unexplained terminology with concrete outcomes.

Set the editorial constraints

Give the writing teammate a clear audience, purpose and approved facts. Include a short voice sample when tone matters, and state what the draft must not promise. Save a draft file for review rather than treating a generated message as published copy. A final human edit should verify names, dates, claims and links against the source material.

Inputs for this workflow: Reviewed technical text and a description of the new audience.

Work through the task

1. Identify terms needing explanation.
2. Keep technical limits in plain language.

A brief you can adapt

Rewrite the text for an operations manager. Retain configuration prerequisites and known limits; add a glossary rather than deleting necessary detail.

The filenames above are examples. Replace them with your actual inputs and destination before submitting the task.

Review the deliverable

Compare the original and revised factual statements side by side.

Where this approach can fail

Simplification must not turn a conditional capability into an unconditional promise.

For the related desktop setup, see company playbook.