Research
Summary or structured extraction for research?
A summary prioritizes and compresses. Compare the choices before starting your task.
OfficeCubs · · 2 min read
A summary prioritizes and compresses. Extraction preserves selected source fields for comparison. Decide which operation supports the next decision before choosing the task brief.
Compare the practical differences
| Decision | Summary | Structured extraction |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Understanding the main answer and caveats | Comparing consistent fields across records |
| Useful property | Can connect findings into a narrative | Keeps source references beside each value |
| What to check | May omit details needed for later counting | Requires a clear schema and missing-value policy |
A concrete choice
Interview themes can start with extracted observations and participant IDs, then move to a narrative once the evidence table is reviewed.
Verify the choice
Check a sample against the original source and distinguish quoted text from paraphrase in either output.
Write the reason for your choice into the task brief or setup notes. Then run a small representative task and compare the actual result with the requirement that drove the decision. Keep any unmet requirement visible rather than declaring the whole workflow ready from a single successful step.
Continue with the setup
The related desktop guide explains the relevant controls and limits. Use the current application state when applying this comparison; the presence of an option in a document does not mean every dependency on your computer is ready.