Review AI-written copy before publication

Publication review should focus on supported claims and reader action before style polish. A fluent draft can still announce something that is not available.

Work through these checks

1. Audience

confirm who the copy addresses. Record the evidence or the unresolved question before moving on.

2. Claims

verify capabilities and availability. Record the evidence or the unresolved question before moving on.

3. Details

check names, dates and links. Record the evidence or the unresolved question before moving on.

4. Voice

compare wording with the approved style sample. Record the evidence or the unresolved question before moving on.

5. Action

ensure the reader’s next step actually exists. Record the evidence or the unresolved question before moving on.

Put the checklist to work

For a launch post, inspect the download link and availability sentence before choosing the headline.

Keep the checklist beside the task brief and the actual output. Mark a check complete only after inspecting the relevant file, setting or event. If a required check cannot run in the current environment, describe that gap and choose an appropriate next review rather than substituting a confident summary.

A boundary to remember

A draft is not permission to publish or send a message through another service.

For the corresponding controls and troubleshooting steps, read the desktop help guide. These checks are a practical review aid; adapt them to the specific source material and intended use of your deliverable.