Research
Separate observations from hypotheses in AI reports
A report becomes easier to trust when readers can tell what was observed and what is proposed as an explanation.
OfficeCubs · · 2 min read
A report becomes easier to trust when readers can tell what was observed and what is proposed as an explanation. Keep the evidence trail visible for both.
Compare the practical differences
| Decision | Observation | Hypothesis |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | A statement supported by supplied evidence | A possible explanation or prediction |
| Useful property | Can be checked against a source location | Useful for planning the next investigation |
| What to check | Limited by the source’s coverage and quality | Needs additional evidence before being treated as fact |
A concrete choice
An export shows fewer orders this week; a campaign change might explain it. Record the count as observed and the cause as a hypothesis to test.
Verify the choice
Review causal language and require a source for every factual claim.
Write the reason for your choice into the task brief or setup notes. Then run a small representative task and compare the actual result with the requirement that drove the decision. Keep any unmet requirement visible rather than declaring the whole workflow ready from a single successful step.
Continue with the setup
The related desktop guide explains the relevant controls and limits. Use the current application state when applying this comparison; the presence of an option in a document does not mean every dependency on your computer is ready.